JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 16, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Ministro De Hacienda Y Credito Publico

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Incidente De Impacto Fiscal
  • Requisitos
Solicitud De Apertura De Incidente De Impacto Fiscal
  • Se concede la apertura del incidente de impacto fiscal solicitado por el Ministro de Hacienda y Crédito Público y se otorga un plazo para la respectiva sustentación
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Sala Plena de la Corporación dispone la apertura del incidente de impacto fiscal presentada por el Ministro de Hacienda y Crédito Público sobre la sentencia C-492/15.

Se otorga al precitado funcionario el término de 30 días para sustentar el incidente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (24 points)
  1. Primero. DISPONER la apertura del incidente de impacto fiscal presentada por el Ministro de Hacienda y Crédito Público sobre la sentencia C-492 de 2015.
  2. Segundo. OTORGAR al Ministro de Hacienda y Crédito Público el término de treinta (30) días hábiles para que sustente el incidente.
  3. MARÍA VICTORIA CALLE CORREA
  4. Presidenta (E)
  5. MAURICIO GONZÁLEZ CUERVO
  6. Magistrado
  7. LUIS GUILLERMO GUERRERO PÉREZ
  8. Magistrado
  9. Con aclaración de voto
  10. GABRIEL EDUARDO MENDOZA MARTELO
  11. Magistrado
  12. GLORIA STELLA ORTIZ DELGADO
  13. Magistrada
  14. Con aclaración de voto
  15. JORGE IVÁN PALACIO PALACIO
  16. Magistrado
  17. JORGE IGNACIO PRETELT CHALJUB
  18. Magistrado
  19. Ausente
  20. ALBERTO ROJAS RIOS
  21. Magistrado
  22. LUIS ERNESTO VARGAS SILVA
  23. Magistrado
  24. MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA MENDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Concurring opinion
Read concurrence
✓
Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
Concurring opinion
Read concurrence
✓
Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub
Magistrado
Separate opinions — text available3
ConcurrenceMaría Victoria Calle CorreaConcurrenceLuis Guillermo Guerrero PérezConcurrenceGloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.